Posts Tagged speed

To hell with NTFS – running the same proc on ext4 is over twice as fast

The way I have my partitions setup is 50GB of EXT4 for linux and 300GB of NTFS for general file storage so that I can access them if I dual boot in windows or anything else int he future.. Compatibility was the name of the game.  Because of this I end up storing most of my working files on the NTFS and working off that drive keeping the EXT4 for linux system files only.  Well that was until today when I happened to have top running while executing a new script I am just finishing off.. The script does a LOT of search and replacing with sed, queries with awk and some other bash fun.  This particular one was taking a 24MB file and breaking it down into 2.5MB chunks based on the contents of the file.  Searches for the 1200th instance of a marker, takes all the content above that, puts it into a new file and then deletes it from the original.  Rinse repeat, rinse repeat.. Anyways top was showing that ntfs-3g was hogging 90% of the cpu while this was going on so out of curiosity I redid the job this time piping it through PV to get a timer on it.  End result: 5 minutes 25 seconds.

Sooo I wondered how long would it take if I moved all my stuff over to my EXT4 partition and ran it there.  End result: 2 minutes and 44 seconds.   Boooya, I’ve just cut down the processing time of my scripts by half just by running them on my EXT4 partition.

Just thought I would share for all those people wanting results from a real life performance test, it’s pretty substantial.

Tags: , , , , ,

A Windows OS vs Snow Leopard benchmarks are in. Prepare not to be surprised

Just caught this story on Cnet and thought I’d share.  Benchmarks of Windows 7 Vs Snow Leopard are coming in and the results are pretty much what you’d expect them to be.  Windows trumps the show with 3D stuff and Gaming, Snow Leopard takes the cake with Multitasking, encoding and boot times, as well as Battery life.

The entire article can be found here: http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-31012_7-10319612-10355804.html and here are some of the highlights:

The conclusion? First all of all, you’ll get much better battery life running OS X on Mac laptops than running Windows. Secondly, performance-wise, Windows 7 is probably a better choice if you are a gamer (there are more games developed for Windows, anyway), even on Mac hardware.

Third, if you can get by with just software designed by Apple and if money is not a big issue, you will be happy with a Mac. Examples of these software choices are iTunes, iLife, QuickTime, Safari, iChat, and so on (and you probably won’t need much more than those for daily entertainment and communication needs). Finally, if money is not an issue–and it definitely is for most of us–you should get a Mac anyway. It’s the only platform, for now, that can run both Windows and OS X.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin